1962 Reliant Sabre Six vs. 2005 Saab 9000

To start off, 2005 Saab 9000 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Saab 9000 (115 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000 should accelerate faster than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saab 9000 weights approximately 769 kg more than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Reliant Sabre Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Saab 9000 (280 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. (185 Nm). This means 2005 Saab 9000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six.

Compare all specifications: