1962 Renault 4 vs. 1953 Talbot Baby
To start off, 1962 Renault 4 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Talbot Baby weights approximately 1110 kg more than 1962 Renault 4.
Because 1953 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Renault 4 | 1953 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Renault | Talbot |
Model | 4 | Baby |
Year Released | 1962 | 1953 |
Engine Size | 603 cc | 2690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 546 kg | 1656 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3130 mm |