1962 Renault 4 vs. 2010 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XK is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 4 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XK weights approximately 1207 kg more than 1962 Renault 4.
Because 2010 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Renault 4 | 2010 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Renault | Jaguar |
Model | 4 | XK |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 603 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 510 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 546 kg | 1753 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4793 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1321 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 61 L |