1962 Renault 4 vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz S
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz S is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 4 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz S is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercedes-Benz S weights approximately 1475 kg more than 1962 Renault 4.
Because 2010 Mercedes-Benz S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Mercedes-Benz S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Renault 4 | 2010 Mercedes-Benz S | |
| Make | Renault | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 4 | S |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 603 cc | 5500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 382 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 546 kg | 2021 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5245 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1872 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3165 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 90 L |
