1962 Renault 4 vs. 2012 Aston Martin DBS
To start off, 2012 Aston Martin DBS is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 4 would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2012 Aston Martin DBS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Aston Martin DBS weights approximately 1149 kg more than 1962 Renault 4.
Because 2012 Aston Martin DBS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Aston Martin DBS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Renault 4 | 2012 Aston Martin DBS | |
| Make | Renault | Aston Martin |
| Model | 4 | DBS |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 603 cc | 5900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 510 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 546 kg | 1695 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4719 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2741 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 80 L |
