1962 Renault 8 vs. 1949 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1962 Renault 8 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 1,247 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Triumph Mayflower is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Renault 8 (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1949 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Renault 8 should accelerate faster than 1949 Triumph Mayflower. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Triumph Mayflower weights approximately 210 kg more than 1962 Renault 8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Renault 8 | 1949 Triumph Mayflower | |
| Make | Renault | Triumph |
| Model | 8 | Mayflower |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 956 cc | 1247 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2110 mm |
