1962 Renault 8 vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1969 Riley Kestrel is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Riley Kestrel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Riley Kestrel (64 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Riley Kestrel should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 170 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Renault 8 | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Renault | Riley |
| Model | 8 | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 956 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2380 mm |
