1962 Renault 8 vs. 1982 Holden Camira
To start off, 1982 Holden Camira is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Holden Camira is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Holden Camira (86 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Holden Camira should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Holden Camira weights approximately 300 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Renault 8 | 1982 Holden Camira | |
| Make | Renault | Holden |
| Model | 8 | Camira |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 956 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1040 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2580 mm |
