1962 Renault 8 vs. 1996 Rover 220
To start off, 1996 Rover 220 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 220 (103 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 220 should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 220 weights approximately 474 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 220, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Renault 8 | 1996 Rover 220 | |
| Make | Renault | Rover |
| Model | 8 | 220 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 956 cc | 1993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 103 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1214 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2510 mm |
