1962 Renault 8 vs. 2004 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2004 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 664 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Renault 8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Renault 8 | 2004 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Renault | Nissan |
| Model | 8 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 956 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1404 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2660 mm |
