1962 Renault 8 vs. 2004 Volkswagen Caddy
To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Volkswagen Caddy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volkswagen Caddy (74 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Caddy should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volkswagen Caddy weights approximately 736 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Caddy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Renault 8 | 2004 Volkswagen Caddy | |
Make | Renault | Volkswagen |
Model | 8 | Caddy |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2510 mm |