1962 Renault 8 vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 2,901 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 221 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1366 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Renault 8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Renault 8 | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Renault | Volvo |
Model | 8 | XC90 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 268 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 2106 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2870 mm |