1962 Renault 8 vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1050 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Renault 8 | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Renault | Cadillac |
Model | 8 | CTS |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 3173 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2890 mm |