1962 Renault 8 vs. 2012 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XJ is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XJ (271 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1056 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Renault 8 | 2012 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Renault | Jaguar |
Model | 8 | XJ |
Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1796 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5127 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1895 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 3157 mm |