1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud vs. 1999 Volvo C70
To start off, 1999 Volvo C70 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,223 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 606 kg more than 1999 Volvo C70.
Because 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | 1999 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Volvo |
Model | Silver Cloud | C70 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1999 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6223 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 165 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 104.1 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1981 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5380 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 68 L |