1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud vs. 2010 Chevrolet Silverado
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Silverado is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,223 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 720 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Silverado.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Silverado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Silverado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | 2010 Chevrolet Silverado | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Chevrolet |
| Model | Silver Cloud | Silverado |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6223 cc | 5998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 360 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1981 kg | 1261 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5380 mm | 6580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 4250 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 129 L |
