1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,223 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 244 kg more than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox.
Because 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Chevrolet |
Model | Silver Cloud | Equinox |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6223 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 180 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 104.1 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 98 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1981 kg | 1737 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5380 mm | 4771 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2857 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 71 L |