1962 Seat 1400 vs. 2005 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Seat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Seat 1400 would be higher. At 2,874 cc, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1962 Seat 1400. (49 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1962 Seat 1400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 835 kg more than 1962 Seat 1400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (305 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Seat 1400. (88 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Seat 1400.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Seat 1400 | 2005 SsangYong Rexton | |
| Make | Seat | SsangYong |
| Model | 1400 | Rexton |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1395 cc | 2874 cc |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 88 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1900 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2830 mm |
