1962 Seat 600 vs. 1991 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 1991 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,043 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Volkswagen Polo (43 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1962 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1962 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 275 kg more than 1962 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Volkswagen Polo (76 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1991 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Seat 600.

Compare all specifications: