1962 Seat 600 vs. 1998 Volkswagen Caddy

To start off, 1998 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Volkswagen Caddy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Volkswagen Caddy (59 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1962 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Volkswagen Caddy should accelerate faster than 1962 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Volkswagen Caddy weights approximately 460 kg more than 1962 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Volkswagen Caddy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Volkswagen Caddy (116 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Volkswagen Caddy will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Seat 600.

Compare all specifications: