1962 Seat 600 vs. 2001 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2001 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1962 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1962 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 710 kg more than 1962 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2001 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Seat 600 | 2001 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Seat | Nissan |
| Model | 600 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 597 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 40 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1285 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2540 mm |
