1962 Seat 600 vs. 2010 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2010 Nissan Titan is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Seat 600 would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Titan (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 298 more horse power than 1962 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1962 Seat 600.
Because 2010 Nissan Titan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Seat 600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Titan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Titan (522 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 482 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Seat 600 | 2010 Nissan Titan | |
| Make | Seat | Nissan |
| Model | 600 | Titan |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 597 cc | 5551 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 317 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 40 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 5710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 4060 mm |
