1962 Seat 600 vs. 2012 Renault Megane
To start off, 2012 Renault Megane is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Megane (221 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1962 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1962 Seat 600.
Because 1962 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Megane (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Seat 600 | 2012 Renault Megane | |
Make | Seat | Renault |
Model | 600 | Megane |
Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 597 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 40 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2630 mm |