1962 Skoda Octavia vs. 2000 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2000 Subaru Forester is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Skoda Octavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Skoda Octavia would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Subaru Forester weights approximately 592 kg more than 1962 Skoda Octavia.
Because 2000 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Skoda Octavia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Subaru Forester (186 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Skoda Octavia. (73 Nm). This means 2000 Subaru Forester will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Skoda Octavia.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Skoda Octavia | 2000 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Skoda | Subaru |
Model | Octavia | Forester |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1089 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 73 Nm | 186 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1512 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2680 mm |