1962 Steyr 650T vs. 1968 Triumph 2.5
To start off, 1968 Triumph 2.5 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Steyr 650T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Steyr 650T would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Triumph 2.5 (150 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1962 Steyr 650T. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Triumph 2.5 should accelerate faster than 1962 Steyr 650T. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Triumph 2.5 weights approximately 633 kg more than 1962 Steyr 650T. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Triumph 2.5 (222 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Steyr 650T. (40 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1968 Triumph 2.5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Steyr 650T.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Steyr 650T | 1968 Triumph 2.5 | |
Make | Steyr | Triumph |
Model | 650T | 2.5 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 641 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 20 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 40 Nm | 222 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1133 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2970 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2700 mm |