1962 Steyr 650T vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Steyr 650T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Steyr 650T would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 133 more horse power than 1962 Steyr 650T. (20 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1962 Steyr 650T.
Because 1962 Steyr 650T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Steyr 650T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Steyr 650T. (40 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Steyr 650T.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Steyr 650T | 2011 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Steyr | Holden |
| Model | 650T | Epica |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 641 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 20 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 40 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 2970 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2700 mm |
