1962 Steyr 700C vs. 2011 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2011 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Steyr 700C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Steyr 700C would be higher. At 2,604 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda BT-50 (123 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1962 Steyr 700C. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1962 Steyr 700C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 585 kg more than 1962 Steyr 700C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Steyr 700C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda BT-50 (206 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Steyr 700C. (40 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Steyr 700C.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Steyr 700C | 2011 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Steyr | Mazda |
Model | 700C | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 641 cc | 2604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 20 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 40 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1950 mm | 3010 mm |