1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk vs. 2013 Mazda CX-09
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-09 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-09 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-09 weights approximately 762 kg more than 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 2013 Mazda CX-09 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-09 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk | 2013 Mazda CX-09 | |
Make | Studebaker | Mazda |
Model | Sky Hawk | CX-09 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2779 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 269 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 2062 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 5108 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1728 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 76 L |