1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk vs. 2013 Toyota Sienna
To start off, 2013 Toyota Sienna is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Sienna is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Sienna weights approximately 815 kg more than 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Sienna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk | 2013 Toyota Sienna | |
Make | Studebaker | Toyota |
Model | Sky Hawk | Sienna |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2779 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 262 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 2115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 5085 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1985 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1811 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 79 L |