1962 Sunbeam Alpine vs. 2009 Holden Barina
To start off, 2009 Holden Barina is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Sunbeam Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Sunbeam Alpine would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Barina is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1962 Sunbeam Alpine is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Sunbeam Alpine. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Barina (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Sunbeam Alpine. (127 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Holden Barina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Sunbeam Alpine.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Sunbeam Alpine | 2009 Holden Barina | |
Make | Sunbeam | Holden |
Model | Alpine | Barina |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1592 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1650 mm |