1962 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,390 cc, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volkswagen Polo (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 609 kg more than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volkswagen Polo (127 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2005 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Suzuki Fronte | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Suzuki | Volkswagen |
| Model | Fronte | Polo |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 360 cc | 1390 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1109 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2470 mm |
