1962 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2010 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Charger is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1216 kg more than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Charger (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Suzuki Fronte | 2010 Dodge Charger | |
| Make | Suzuki | Dodge |
| Model | Fronte | Charger |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 360 cc | 3500 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 250 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1716 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 5083 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1478 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3048 mm |
