1962 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2010 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC60 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo XC60 (281 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 263 more horse power than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 1393 kg more than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo XC60 (400 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 368 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2010 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Suzuki Fronte | 2010 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Suzuki | Volvo |
Model | Fronte | XC60 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 360 cc | 3000 cc |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 32 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1893 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2774 mm |