1962 Toyota Crown vs. 2006 Volvo C70
To start off, 2006 Volvo C70 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo C70 (138 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1962 Toyota Crown. (80 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1962 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo C70 weights approximately 443 kg more than 1962 Toyota Crown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo C70 (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Toyota Crown. (145 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2006 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Toyota Crown | 2006 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Crown | C70 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1897 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 22.5:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1255 kg | 1698 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 62 L |