1962 Toyota Crown vs. 2010 Ford Fusion
To start off, 2010 Ford Fusion is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Fusion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Fusion (263 HP) has 183 more horse power than 1962 Toyota Crown. (80 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Fusion should accelerate faster than 1962 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Fusion weights approximately 374 kg more than 1962 Toyota Crown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Fusion (337 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Toyota Crown. (145 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Fusion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Toyota Crown | 2010 Ford Fusion | |
| Make | Toyota | Ford |
| Model | Crown | Fusion |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1897 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 80 HP | 263 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 337 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1255 kg | 1629 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4841 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1834 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1445 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2728 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 66 L |
