1962 Triumph Vitesse vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (210 HP) has 140 more horse power than 1962 Triumph Vitesse. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1962 Triumph Vitesse.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (313 Nm) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Triumph Vitesse. (125 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Triumph Vitesse.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Triumph Vitesse | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Triumph | Holden |
| Model | Vitesse | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 313 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
