1962 Triumph Vitesse vs. 2012 Audi Q3
To start off, 2012 Audi Q3 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 1,964 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi Q3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi Q3 (138 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1962 Triumph Vitesse. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi Q3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Triumph Vitesse.
Because 2012 Audi Q3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Triumph Vitesse. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi Q3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi Q3 (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Triumph Vitesse. (125 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2012 Audi Q3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Triumph Vitesse.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Triumph Vitesse | 2012 Audi Q3 | |
Make | Triumph | Audi |
Model | Vitesse | Q3 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1600 mm |