1962 Vauxhall Velox vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Vauxhall Velox. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Vauxhall Velox would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura TL (200 HP) has 106 more horse power than 1962 Vauxhall Velox. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1962 Vauxhall Velox.
Because 1962 Vauxhall Velox is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Vauxhall Velox. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Vauxhall Velox | 1996 Acura TL | |
| Make | Vauxhall | Acura |
| Model | Velox | TL |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2651 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4864 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1405 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2840 mm |
