1962 Volkswagen 1500 vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1968 ZAZ 966 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 1,493 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Volkswagen 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Volkswagen 1500 (52 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1968 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Volkswagen 1500 should accelerate faster than 1968 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Volkswagen 1500 weights approximately 120 kg more than 1968 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Volkswagen 1500 | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Volkswagen | ZAZ |
Model | 1500 | 966 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
Engine Size | 1493 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2170 mm |