1962 Volkswagen 1500 vs. 2006 Volvo S40
To start off, 2006 Volvo S40 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 1,948 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo S40 (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1962 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1962 Volkswagen 1500.
Because 1962 Volkswagen 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Volkswagen 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Volkswagen 1500 | 2006 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Volvo |
| Model | 1500 | S40 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1493 cc | 1948 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 52 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 60 L |
