1962 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ecosport (67 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1962 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1962 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia.
Because 1962 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Volkswagen | Ford |
Model | Karmann-Ghia | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1285 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2490 mm |