1962 Volvo 220 vs. 2010 Citroen C3
To start off, 2010 Citroen C3 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C3 (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Citroen C3 weights approximately 237 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C3 (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2010 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Volvo 220 | 2010 Citroen C3 | |
| Make | Volvo | Citroen |
| Model | 220 | C3 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1778 cc | 1587 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1252 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 47 L |
