1962 Volvo 220 vs. 2010 Kia Forte
To start off, 2010 Kia Forte is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Forte is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Forte (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Forte should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Forte weights approximately 213 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Kia Forte (195 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2010 Kia Forte will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Volvo 220 | 2010 Kia Forte | |
Make | Volvo | Kia |
Model | 220 | Forte |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1778 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1228 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4529 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1775 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 52 L |