1962 Volvo 220 vs. 2010 Kia Sedona
To start off, 2010 Kia Sedona is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Sedona (244 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Sedona should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Sedona weights approximately 975 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Kia Sedona (343 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2010 Kia Sedona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Volvo 220 | 2010 Kia Sedona | |
| Make | Volvo | Kia |
| Model | 220 | Sedona |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1778 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 244 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 343 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5131 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3020 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 80 L |
