1962 Volvo 220 vs. 2010 Peugeot 3008
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 3008 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Peugeot 3008 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 3008 (148 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 3008 should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 3008 (340 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2010 Peugeot 3008 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Volvo 220 | 2010 Peugeot 3008 | |
| Make | Volvo | Peugeot |
| Model | 220 | 3008 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1778 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4365 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1837 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1639 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2613 mm |
