1962 Zastava 750 vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1983 Zastava 102 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Zastava 102 (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1962 Zastava 750. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1962 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Zastava 102 weights approximately 165 kg more than 1962 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Zastava 750. (46 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1983 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Zastava 750 | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Zastava | Zastava |
| Model | 750 | 102 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 766 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 46 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 605 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2160 mm |
