1962 Zastava 750 vs. 1984 Lancia Beta

To start off, 1984 Lancia Beta is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 1,585 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Lancia Beta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lancia Beta (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1962 Zastava 750. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lancia Beta should accelerate faster than 1962 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Lancia Beta weights approximately 431 kg more than 1962 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Lancia Beta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lancia Beta (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Zastava 750. (46 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1984 Lancia Beta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Zastava 750. 1984 Lancia Beta has automatic transmission and 1962 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1962 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1984 Lancia Beta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: