1962 Zastava 750 vs. 2004 BMW Z4

To start off, 2004 BMW Z4 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 2,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW Z4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW Z4 (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1962 Zastava 750. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW Z4 should accelerate faster than 1962 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW Z4 weights approximately 691 kg more than 1962 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW Z4 (245 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Zastava 750. (46 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 BMW Z4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Zastava 750. 2004 BMW Z4 has automatic transmission and 1962 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1962 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 BMW Z4 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: