1962 Zastava 750 vs. 2004 Dodge Intrepid

To start off, 2004 Dodge Intrepid is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 3,517 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Intrepid is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Intrepid (250 HP) has 226 more horse power than 1962 Zastava 750. (24 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Intrepid should accelerate faster than 1962 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Intrepid weights approximately 965 kg more than 1962 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Intrepid, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Intrepid (306 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Zastava 750. (46 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Intrepid will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Zastava 750. 2004 Dodge Intrepid has automatic transmission and 1962 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1962 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Dodge Intrepid will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: