1962 Zastava 750 vs. 2005 Zastava 103

To start off, 2005 Zastava 103 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 1,242 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Zastava 103 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Zastava 103 (59 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1962 Zastava 750. (24 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Zastava 103 should accelerate faster than 1962 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Zastava 103 weights approximately 315 kg more than 1962 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Zastava 103, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Zastava 103 (88 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Zastava 750. (46 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Zastava 103 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Zastava 750.

Compare all specifications: